BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
X-WR-CALNAME;VALUE=TEXT:Faculty Luncheon: Talking about our Teaching
PRODID:-//Harvard events data//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:event_1323334_0
SUMMARY:Faculty Luncheon: Talking about our Teaching
DESCRIPTION:<p>	<a data-url="https://goo.gl/forms/WkxDV3BN9M1YXatx1" href="https://goo.gl/forms/WkxDV3BN9M1YXatx1" title="RSVP">RSVP</a><br><span style="color:#800000;"><strong>How do course evaluations improve teaching and learning?</strong></span><br><br><drupal-media data-entity-type="media" data-entity-uuid="6ae63229-4e7c-454b-ab66-4dc20fc627d1" data-align="left" alt="andrew ho" data-view-mode="hwp_x_small"></drupal-media>Andrew Ho, PhD <br>Professor of Education <br>Harvard Graduate School of Education<br><!--break--><br><strong><a data-url="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1m064r_fO88jxzZqe6fW0R83T5cobgYaf/view?usp=sharing" href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1m064r_fO88jxzZqe6fW0R83T5cobgYaf/view?usp=sharing" title=""><span style="color:#800000;">PRESENTATION SLIDES: CLICK HERE</span></a><span style="color:#800000;"> </span></strong><br><br><strong>Overview:  </strong></p><p>	We intend course evaluations to answer three questions, from three audiences, for three purposes. 1) From prospective students, for course selection, "What did my fellow students think about this course last year?" 2) From instructors, to improve their instruction, "What did my students think that I could do better next year?" 3) From administrators, to inform promotions and tenure, "Is this candidate fulfilling or excelling in the teaching mission of this school?" Through poor design, poor timing, and poor analysis, all three audiences are underusing and misusing data from course evaluations. I will review best principles from the design, reporting, and deployment of course evaluations. I also propose some pilot studies to improve the use of course evaluations for each audience, for each purpose.</p><p>	<strong>Biography: </strong><br>Andrew Ho is professor of education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. He is a psychometrician whose research aims to improve the design, use, and interpretation of test scores in educational policy and practice. Ho is known for his research documenting the misuse of proficiency-based statistics in state and federal policy analysis. He has also clarified properties of student growth models for both technical and general audiences. His scholarship advocates for designing evaluative metrics to achieve multiple criteria: metrics must be accurate, but also transparent to target audiences and resistant to inflation under perverse incentives. Ho is a member of the National Assessment Governing Board that sets policy for the National Assessment of Educational Progress. He also chairs the Research Committee for the Harvard University Vice Provost for Advances in Learning, where he leads research initiatives in online learning at scale. He holds his Ph.D. in Educational Psychology and his M.S. in Statistics from Stanford University. Before graduate school, he taught middle school creative writing in his hometown of Honolulu, Hawaii, and high school physics and AP physics in Ojai, California.</p>
LOCATION:The Harvard Faculty Club, 20 Quincy St. Cambridge - The East Dining Room 
STATUS:CONFIRMED
DTSTART:20190228T170000Z
DTEND:20190228T180000Z
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR