Deslauriers, Louis, et al. “Transforming the Lowest-Performing Students: An Intervention That Worked.” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 41, no. 6, 2012, pp. 76–84. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/43748583. Accessed 30 Mar. 2020.
Deslauriers, Louis, et al. “Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class.” Science, vol. 332, no. 6031, 2011, pp. 862–864. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/29784281. Accessed 30 Mar. 2020.
Tobias Espinosa, Kelly Miller, Ives Araujo, and Eric Mazur. 2019. “Reducing the gender gap in students’ physics self-efficacy in a team-and project-based introductory physics class.” Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15, 1, Pp. 010132.
Holmes, N. G., Wieman, C, Bonn, D.A. “Teaching Critical Thinking.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 112, no. 36, 2015, pp. 11199–11204. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26464969. Accessed 30 Mar. 2020.
Hyewon Jang, Nathaniel Lasry, Kelly Miller, and Eric Mazur. 3/1/2017. “Collaborative exams: Cheating? Or learning?” American Journal of Physics , 85, 3, Pp. 223-227. Publisher's VersionAbstract
Greg Kestin, Kelly Miller, Logan S McCarty, Kristina Callaghan, and Louis Deslauriers. 2020. “Comparing the effectiveness of online versus live lecture demonstrations.” Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16, 1, Pp. 013101.
N. Lasry, J. Watkins, E. Mazur, and A. Ibrahim. 2013. “Response Times to Conceptual Questions.” Am. J. Phys., 81, Pp. 703–706. Publisher's VersionAbstract
C. Lindstrøm and J. Schell. 2013. “Leveraging technology to enhance evidence-based pedagogy: A case study of Peer Instruction in Norway”. Publisher's VersionAbstract
Meghan Marshall, Lydia Wilkinson, Viviane Yargeau, Maria Orjuela-Laverde, Myra Bloom, Brandiff Caron, Louise Meunier, Greg Zilberbrant, Paul Okrutny, Jonathan Verrett, and others. 2019. “Preparing Tomorrow’s Engineer-Communicators: A Review of Models for Effective Communication Instruction.” Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA).
Maxwell, E. Jane, et al. “An Improved Design for In-Class Review.” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 44, no. 5, 2015, pp. 48–52. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/43631848. Accessed 30 Mar. 2020.
Ana Rita Mota, Nilüfer Didiş Körhasan, Kelly Miller, and Eric Mazur. 2019. “Homework as a metacognitive tool in an undergraduate physics course.” Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15, 1, Pp. 010136.
Kelly Miller, Brian Lukoff, Gary King, and Eric Mazur. 2018. “Use of a social annotation Platform for Pre-class reading assignments in a Flipped introductory Physics class.” In Frontiers in Education, 3: Pp. 8. Frontiers.
Kelly Miller, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip Sadler. 11/7/2017. “The influence of students’ participation in STEM competitions on their interest in STEM careers.” International Journal of Science Education, Part B, Pp. 1-20. Publisher's VersionAbstract
Kelly Miller, Sacha Zyto, David Karger, Junehee Yoo, and Eric Mazur. 2016. “Analysis of student engagement in an online annotation system in the context of a flipped introductory physics class,” 020143, Pp. 1–12.Abstract
Kelly Miller, Julie Schell, Andrew Ho, Brian Lukoff, and Eric Mazur. 2015. “Response switching and self-efficacy in Peer Instruction classrooms.” Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11, 1, Pp. 1–8.Abstract
Kelly Miller, Nathaniel Lasry, Kelvin Chu, and Eric Mazur. 2013. “Role of physics lecture demonstrations in conceptual learning.” Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 9, 2, Pp. 020113. Publisher's Version
Kelly Miller. 2013. “Use demonstrations to teach, not just entertain.” The Physics Teacher, 51, 9, Pp. 570. Publisher's Version
Nilüfer Didiş Körhasan and Kelly Miller. 2019. “Students’ mental models of wave-particle duality.” Canadian Journal of Physics, ja.
Ross, Philip E. "The Expert Mind." Scientific American, August 2006: 64-71. 11. Sept. 2006
Philip M Sadler, Gerhard Sonnert, Harold P Coyle, and Kelly A Miller. 2016. “Identifying Promising Items: The Use of Crowdsourcing in the Development of Assessment Instruments.” Educational Assessment, 21, 3, Pp. 196–214. Publisher's Version
J. Schell. 2012. “How to Transform Learning - With Teaching.” In Leaders of Learners, 5: Pp. 3–5. Publisher's VersionAbstract
Watkins, Jessica, and Eric Mazur. “Retaining Students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Majors.” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 42, no. 5, 2013, pp. 36–41
Wieman, Carl, and Ashley Welsh. “The Connection Between Teaching Methods and Attribution Errors.” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 28, no. 3, 2016, pp. 645–648., www.jstor.org/stable/24761251. Accessed 30 Mar. 2020.
Wieman, Carl E. “Large-Scale Comparison of Science Teaching Methods Sends Clear Message.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 23, 2014, pp. 8319–8320. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/23776405. Accesse
Wieman, Carl E. “The Similarities Between Research in Education and Research in the Hard Sciences.” Educational Researcher, vol. 43, no. 1, 2014, pp. 12–14., www.jstor.org/stable/24571241. Accessed 30 Mar. 2020.
Wieman, Carl. “Applying New Research to Improve Science Education.” Issues in Science and Technology, vol. 29, no. 1, 2012, pp. 25–32. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/43315691. Accessed 30 Mar. 2020.
Wieman, Carl, et al. “Transforming Science Education at Large Research Universities: A Case Study in Progress.” Change, vol. 42, no. 2, 2010, pp. 7–14., www.jstor.org/stable/20696216.
Wieman, Carl. “Editorial: Galvanizing Science Departments.” Science, vol. 325, no. 5945, 2009, pp. 1181–1181. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/40301697.
Wieman, Carl. “Why Not Try: A Scientific Approach to Science Education?” Change, vol. 39, no. 5, 2007, pp. 9–15. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/40178066. Accessed 30 Mar. 2020.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Ch1 -